LEE HARVEY OSWALD

The Men Who Killed Kennedy is a 9-part video documentary series about the John F. Kennedy assassination by Nigel Turner[1] that began with two 50 minutes segments originally aired on 25 October 1988 in the United Kingdom, titled simply Part One and Part Two. The programs were produced by Central Television for the ITV network, and were immediately followed by a studio discussion on the issues titled The Story Continues, chaired by broadcaster Peter Sissons. The United States corporation, Arts & Entertainment Company, purchased the rights to the original two segments. In 1989, the series was nominated for a Flaherty Documentary Award.[2] The series was re-edited with additional material into three 50 minute programs in 1991, which were again shown by ITV. A sixth episode appeared in 1995. The series typically aired in November every year, but also from time to time during the year as repeats. But in November, 2003, when three additional segments ("The Final Chapter") were added by the History Channel, the consequences were so immense that the entire series is no longer aired, though the History Channel still sells DVD copies of the first six documentaries.

Advised viewing! This documentary series answers questions, we all have about the assassination of John F. Kennedy in 1963 in Dallas, Texas. But there is more. When you watch the whole series, this evil event is presented in several ways. Using original material and interviewing eye-witnesses this makes a kind of “time-travel”-investigation possible. In the last fifty years a lot his come about conspiracies, the secret intelligence operations, the major players in this war game, deception, crime-scene investigation and mind control. Insight of the world population is growing and eventually they want to know the truth. And then the rulers of the world, the masters of the universe, better make us laugh, otherwise they might get killed.

Lee Harvey Oswald is a much more colorful character, than portrayed in the infamous “Warren Report”, that concluded that there was only one shooter, who operated alone. He was arrested in a movie-theatre under suspicion of killing a police officer. He was said, to have a revolver. Oswald was under investigation of the FBI, because he supported the “Anti Castro movement”. JFK was not aggressive enough, against the communist regime in Havana. Killing the president was a statement, one of the official conclusions was.

Lee Harvey was a excellent student, who served and made a career in the US Marines for three years. After his dismissal, honorable, he defected to Russia, to stay there for three years.

When he arrived in Moscow, where he met his wife, Oswald spoke Russian fluently. Was the would-be assassin a real defector, who wanted to renounce the USA, or was it a secret (Navy, CIA) operation to test the defectors program of the Russians. Anyway, Oswald returned with his wife Marina, to the United States and settled in Dallas. The couple lives in poverty, but strangely enough, he only spends the weekend with her and his two kids.

Possibly he is doing the same research as he did in the Soviet Union, now focusing on the anti-Castro Cubans, that fled to the States.

Lee Harvey finds a job at the “Texas Bookshop Depository" only a few weeks before the assassination. The manager brings in a rifle into the warehouse and shows it to his employees. He is going “deer hunting”. Oswald denies to have brought a rifle into the building. After the shooting a gun was found, that was later described as being his.

But when you go through the hours of material I noticed that Oswald's behavior before and after the murder, during his arrest and interrogation: gauzy eyes, pale as a ghost, he forgot his wedding ring and money in his apartment, very cool during questioning.” You can see his reaction, when he is accused of murdering Kennedy. Lee Oswald was not the only shooter, but he was a patsy in game over world domination. Remains one question: was Lee Harvey Oswald a Manchurian candidate, brainwashed by the Russians and activated when necessary?